Moral's Mark
MORAL’S MARK Question Everything!
  • Home
  • History
  • Memos
  • Timelines
    • 3000 BC – AD 180
    • AD 500 – present
  • Civilisations
    • Levant
    • Egypt
    • Rome
    • India
    • China
    • Japan
    • Europe
  • The Ptolemy Project
    • The Proposal
    • The Memo
    • The Missing Works
  • People
  • Religion
  • Myth
  • Etymology
  • Politics
  • Science
  • TOE
  • TOC
  • Memos
  • Terms
  • Blog
  • About
Home/Blog/Day 52
← Day 51 All entries Day 53 →
Day 52 Monday 10 August 2026 Secret Harbour, WA by Brett Murrell

THE ILLUSION OF CHOICE

Campaign poster: a figure seated on a three-legged stool, the legs labelled Labor, Liberal and One Nation, above the words Who are you really voting for?
Who are you really voting for?
Campaign graphic reworking the One Nation wordmark to read Two Nation.

Australians need to wake up. One Nation is not the saviour party.

They are aligned with Israel, and their policy on it has not been released — in my view, for a reason. That silence is the question. Do they support a two-state settlement? Do they accept the findings on Gaza? Will they stop the export of Australian weapons and components to Israel? What is their position on Australian citizens serving with a foreign military? What do they say about Lebanon? None of that has been answered, and a party asking for a vote should answer it.

On AUKUS they are clear enough — they support it, which aligns Australia with an America-first posture and against a settlement in our own region. This is bigger than domestic issues. It is about where Australia stands in the world, and it positions us against peace in the Asia-Pacific and against our largest trading partner. It matters who we support and what behaviour we accept.

Labor and the Liberals are not much better on any of this. But One Nation must be called out on its position, because it is seeing a huge increase in votes — and what it is offering is the illusion of choice. If three parties will not answer the same question, that is not a choice.

Australians should not accept it. Voting for a party that will not state a position on this is not a neutral act.

One Nation supports AUKUS. That aligns us with an America-first posture and with Trump, against peace in the Asia-Pacific and against our largest trading partner. It matters who we support and what behaviour we accept.

My view: One Nation is a divider, not a uniter, and division is what will tear this country apart. For anyone looking for an alternative to Labor and Liberal, I do not believe they are the answer.

So who then? Sovereign Australia. Become a SAPper — a candidate at the coming state and federal elections. We will unite the nation, and we will publish the plan to move it in the direction Australians actually need.

United we stand, divided we fall.

For contrast, here is our own position on the same questions — published in full, alongside every other party’s, so anyone can hold us to it:

Comparison table: where the parties stand on Israel and Palestine — recognition and border, Gaza, Lebanon, arrivals and displacement, settlements, arms and components, Australians who served, and foreign influence at home — across Sovereign Australia, Labor, the Coalition, the Greens and One Nation.
Where the parties stand — issue by issue
Table: the law as it stands — the Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme Act, foreign interference offences, the foreign donation ban, the Electoral Reform Act 2025, the register of members’ interests and the lobbyist register — with the gap in each.
The law as it stands, and the gap in each instrument
Table: where the state governments stand — premiers’ stated positions, protest law, banned phrases and hate-speech offences, and cultural interventions across NSW, Victoria, Queensland, WA, SA and Tasmania.
And where the state governments stand

Three columns in that first table read “no stated position”. That is the whole point of this post.

Our full position on Israel and Palestine, issue by issue, is published: the policy, the memo, and where every party stands.

← Day 51 All entries Day 53 →
Moral’s Mark

The personal site of Brett Murrell. Posts, memos and photos — covering the civilisations of the ancient world, religion, myth, etymology, statecraft and science. Question Everything! — signed and stood behind.

Part of a four-site family. multimodalcorridors.com

The Site
  • Home
  • Master Timeline
  • Civilisations
  • People
  • Religion
  • Myth
  • Etymology
  • Politics
The Archive
  • Library
  • Etymology
  • About
The Family
  • MMC — Engineering →
  • Sovereign Australia — Politics →
  • MMA — Movement →

© Brett Murrell · All thoughts signed and public · Built static · No tracking